Terminology of the Border Studies as an Interdisciplinary Problem of the Ethnological Discourse

Author

Mykytenko Oksana

a Doctor of Philology, a chief research fellow of the Ukrainian and Foreign Folkloristics Department of M. Rylskyi Institute of Art Studies, Folkloristics and Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-8557

Terminology of the Border Studies as an Interdisciplinary Problem of the  Ethnological Discourse

Abstract

The article is about the relevance of border studies in modern European ethnological discourse focused on the symbolic, cultural, geographic, sociological, political, anthropological and other aspects of the investigation. Correlation of the global and the local, or macro- and micro levels in border studies seems to be one of the fundamental theoretical proposition, especially when the question is on the ethnically mosaic Balkan region. The many-sided scientific study causes considerably the breadth of the terminology, connected with the necessity to discern the terms boundary, border, frontier, understanding that each of them can give the adequate model constructing different border zone peculiarities. Anthropological discourse is based on the concept of the boundary as a real territory and at the same time as a symbolically existing space marked with the certain cultural and mythological senses. The processes of the European integration are held simultaneously with the new borders establishment – both real and symbolic, that is especially typical for the Balkan region which ethnocultural space appears as a row of the variants.

The article is aimed at the description of the necessity to take into account the interaction and correlation of various historical periods, traditions and cultures during the analysis of a certain ethno-cultural dialect. The relevance of such discourse is determined by the historical heritage of the region revealed as the continuation of tradition or is followed as its reflection.

Keywords

terminology, border studies, border zone, European ethnology, identity.

References

1. BALLA, Mykola, compiler. The English-Ukrainian Dictionary. Kyiv: Education, 1996, vol. 1 [in English, in Ukrainian].
2. KYRCHIV, Roman. Studies on Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic and Cultural Borderland. Lviv: Ivan Franko LNU, 2013 [in Ukrainian].
3. NITSIAKOS, Vassilis. From Pre-Modern “Gurbet” (Emigration) to Post-Modern Transnationalism. Theoretical and Methodological Reflections Based on a Case Study. In: Petko HRISTOV, compiler. Bulgarian Ethnology, 2013 (Yr. XXXIX), no. 2, pp. 135–148 [in Bulgarian].
4. TONCHEVA, Veselka. The Unknown Gora. Sofia: Kin, 2012, 320 pp. [in Bulgarian].
5. HRISTOV, Petko. Labour Mobility in the Balkans – Historical Patterns and Modern Development. In: Biljana RISTOVSKA-JOSIFOVSKA, ed. Migrations in the Balkans: Bilateral Researches. Skopje: Institute of National History, 2011, pp. 73–103 [in Bulgarian].
6. BARTH, Fredrik. Introduction. In: Fredrik BARTH, ed., Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1969, pp. 9–38 [in English].
7. BARTH, Fredrik. The Analysis of Culture in Complex Societies. In: Ulla WAGNER, Ulf HANNERZ, eds., Ethnos. London: Routledge, 1989, no. 54, iss. 3–4, pp. 120–142 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1989.9981389.
8. DANFORTH, Loring M. How Can a Woman Give a Birth to one Greek and one Macedonian? The Construction of National Identity among Immagrants to Australia from Northern Greece. [Publication title – Macedonia: The Politics of Identity and Difference]. Edited by Jane K. COWAN. London: Pluto Press, 2000, 184 pp. [in English].
9. DONNAN, Hastings and Thomas M. WILSON. An Anthropology of Frontiers. In: Hastings DONNAN, Thomas M. WILSON, eds. Border Approaches. Anthropological Perspectives on Frontiers. Maryland: University Press of America, 1994, pp. 1–14 [in English].
10. GOSZTONYI, Kristóf. Mostar: Borders, Boundaries, Interest Groups. In: Europæa. Journal des Européanistes. Journal of the Europeanists, 1996, vol. II, iss. 1, pp. 49–76 [in English].
11. JENSEN Møller, Inge and JENSEN Møller, Erik. A Descriptive Elucidation of the German Minority in North Schleswig in 1945–1970. University of Copenhagen, 1974 [in Danish].
12. KEARNEY, Michael. Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire. In: Journal of Historical Sociology, 1991, vol. 4, no. 1 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1991.tb00116.x.
13. KÖSTLIN, Konrad. Vanishing Borders and the Rise of Culture(s). In: Marie SANDBERG, Monique SCHEER, eds., Ethnologia Europaea. Journal of European Ethnology, 2017, vol. 47, no. 1 (Special Issue: 50 Years of Ethnologia Europaea), pp. 58–64 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1226.
14. SACK, Robert D. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986 [in English].
15. THOMASSEN, Bjørn. Border Studies in Europe: Symbolic and Political Boundaries, Anthropological Perspectives. In: Europæa. Journal des Européanistes. Journal of the Europeanists, 1996, vol. II, iss. 1, pp. 37–48 [in English].
16. VERENI, Piero. Boundaries, Frontiers, Persons, Individuals: Questioning “Identity” at National Borders. In: Europæa. Journal des Européanistes. Journal of the Europeanists, 1996, vol. II, iss. 1, pp. 77–90 [in English].