Back to the journal

Methods of studying living space in border areas

Read the articleRead the articleDownload the article
The authors of the publication:
Vermenych Yaroslava
p.:
6-14
UDC:
303.42:316.353-024.536
Bibliographic description:
Vermenych, Ya. (2018) Methods of studying living space in border areas. Materials to Ukrainian Ethnology, 17 (20), 6–14.

Author

VermenychYaroslava

a Doctor of History, professor, head of the Department of historical regional studies of the Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

 

Methods of studying living space in border areas

 

Abstract

The South of Ukraine is an extremely specific region. This is, first of all, the contact zone, the range of the meeting of the Mediterranean and nomadic civilizations, the region of the coloniza- tion processes, which have started long before the period of our era. Secondly, this is the terri- tory of the Ukrainian Cossacks formation. It is the belligerent military community, which has responded adequately to the challenge of the nomadic Steppe and cleared the space for new social relations on this territory. Thirdly, it is an arena of active mixing of various ethnic communities and the competition of various types of nationalism. Contacts and conflicts on this territory for centuries have created a diverse mixture of borrowings and mutual misunderstandings, which form the object of increased scientific interest.

The complex interweaving of various civilizational influences in combination with the histori- cally determined ethno-cultural, linguistic, confessional diversity for many centuries has created a society that is unstable in its conscious priorities in the South of Ukraine. It is difficult to identify it by traditional features that have dominated in Ukrainian regional analytics for a long time. Traditional Soviet vision of the Southern Ukraine region predominantly as an area of a new familiarization, has not been useful for its study as a historically formed integrity with its own ethno-genetic code, peculiarities of social stratification, socio-normative and political culture. The scientific searches and established approaches with the domination of the narrative and the lack of attempts to enter the history of the region into the global process of interaction of civilizations, states, ethnic groups and cultures have been hindered.

The time has come for the transition to a new scientific language, which is devoid of linearity in the approaches and simplified explanations. The latest trends in world history and the focus on universalism of conceptual foundations, the emphasis on related stories and interstate, inte- rethnic relations, captious attention to the borderline specificity of territories and societies should be taken into account as much as possible.

 

Keywords

Historical Regionalistics, Southern Ukraine, civilizational boundary, regional analysis, borders.

 

References

  1. HALENKO, O. What Ottoman Possessions Existed on the Crimean Peninsula? In: Hennadiy BORIAK (compiler), Valeriy SMOLIY (editor). Crimea: A Path through the Ages: A History in Questions and Answers. Kyiv: NASU Institute of History of Ukraine, 2014, p. 111 [in Ukrainian].
  2. GRITSENKO, Anton. Influence of Political and Landscape Frontiers on Regional Identity in the Russian-Ukrainian Borderland. An author’s abstract of Ph.D. in Geography thesis. RAS Institute of Geography. Specialty: 25.00.24 – Economic, Social, Political, and Recreational Geography. Moscow, 2010, 25 pp. [in Russian].
  3. HULEVYCH, Vladyslav. Crimean Khanate and the Northern Black Sea Coast during the Reign of Haji Giray (1442–1466). In: Valeriy SMOLIY, ed.-in-chief, The Ukrainian Historical Journal, 2014, 6, 4–28 [in Ukrainian].
  4. PANCHUK, May (ed.). Ethno-Political Processes in Ukraine: Regional Features. Kyiv: Ivan Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2011, 395, [1] pp. [in Ukrainian].
  5. KOGAN, V. Formation of a Frontier Man: Marginalization, Integration, and Androginization. In: Proceedings of the Volodymyr Vernadskyi Taurida National University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology, 2007, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 169–174 [in Russian].
  6. KONONOV, Illia. Donbass in Ethno-Cultural Coordinates of Ukraine (A Sociological Analysis). An author’s abstract of the Doctor of Social Sciences thesis, Taras Shevchenko Luhansk National Pedagogical University. Specialty: 22.00.04 – Special and Branch Sociologies. Kyiv, 2005 [in Ukrainian].
  7. KONONOV, Illia. Donbas and Halychyna: Causes of Tensions in Their Relations and Search for a Historical Compromise. In: Illia KONONOV, ed., Relations between the East and the West of Ukraine: Past, Present, and Future: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Conference, May 25–26, 2006. Taras Shevchenko Luhansk National Pedagogical University. Luhansk: Knowledge, 2006, pp. 5–27 [in Ukrainian].
  8. BORIAK, Hennadiy (compiler), Valeriy SMOLIY (editor). Crimea: A Path through the Ages: A History in Questions and Answers. Kyiv: NASU Institute of History of Ukraine, 2014, 456 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  9. KUROMIYA, Hiroaki. Donbas between Ukraine and Russia: An Extra-National Identity? In: Illia KONONOV, ed., Globalization. Regionalization. Regional Policy: A Reading-Book on the Contemporary History of Regions. Luhansk: Alma Mater – Knowledge, 2002, pp. 541–554 [in Ukrainian].
  10. KUROMIYA, Hiroaki. Freedom and Terror in the Donbas. A Ukrainian-Russian Borderland, 1870s–1990s. Kyiv: Osnovy, 2002 [in Ukrainian].
  11. MALANIUK, Yevhen. Essays on the History of Our Culture. Kyiv: Oberehy, 1992 [in Ukrainian].
  12. NAZARETYAN, Hagop. Civilization Crises in the Context of Universal History: Synerge- tics, Psychology, and Futurology: A Monograph. Moscow: Per Se, 2001, 240 pp. [in Russian].
  13. PAPAKIN, Heorhiy. Competition for the Ukrainian Crown in the XVIIIth Century: the First Contenders. In Valeriy SMOLIY, ed.-in-chief, Early Modern Ukraine at the Crossroads of Civilizations, Cultures, States, and Regions. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine, 2014, pp. 120–128 [in Ukrainian].
  14. ROZOV, Nikolay. Geopolitics, Geo-economics and Geo-Culture: Relationship of Dynamic Spheres in the History of Russia. In: Vladimir SOGRIN, ed.–in-chief, Social Sciences and the Contemporary World, 2011, 4, 107–121 [in Russian].
  15. TURCHENKO, Halyna. Southern Ukraine at the Turn of Ages (1914–1922). Zaporizhzhia: Prosvita, 2005, 324 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  16. KHOBTA, Svitlana. The Image of a «Resident of the Borderland»: A Research Methodology and Results. In: Hryhoriy Zadorozhnyi, ed.-in-chief, Bulletin of the Vasyl Karazin Kharkiv National University. Kharkiv, 2010, no. 889, iss. 25: Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, pp. 87–91 [in Russian].
  17. Kuzio Taras, Andrew WILSON. Ukraine: Perestroika to Independence. London: Macmillan, 1994 [in English].
© ІМФЕ