Back to the journal

Ethnography at a Distance: A New Approach to Researching the Lifestyles and Agricultural Practices of Urban Population During the War

Read the articleRead the articleDownload the article
The authors of the publication:
Lytvynchuk Nataliіa
p.:
55–59
UDC:
39:004.775]:316.728:355.01(477:470)“20”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/mue2024.23.055
Bibliographic description:
Lytvynchuk, N. (2024). Ethnography at a Distance: A New Approach to Researching the Lifestyles and Agricultural Practices of Urban Population During the War. Materials to Ukrainian Ethnology, 23 (26), 55–59.
Received:
17.09.2024
Recommended for publishing:
10.12.2024

Author

Lytvynchuk Nataliіa

a Ph. D. in History, a research fellow at the Ukrainian Ethnological Center Department of M. Rylskyi Institute of Art Studies, Folkloristics and Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine).

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-9662

 

Ethnography at a Distance: A New Approach to Researching
the Lifestyles and Agricultural Practices of Urban Population During the War

 

Abstract

The experience of using the method of remote ethnography to study the realities of wartime everyday life, in particular economic life and agricultural practices in small towns on the Ukrainian-Russian border is described in the article. The territory has become in fact a frontline zone with the beginning of the full-scale invasion. The authoress details the specifics of working in the field beyond the physical reach because of the hostilities, and recreates the mechanism of recording empirical materials and joining communities and their environment in the conditions of so-called spatial inaccessibility.

The use of this method is caused by the situational circumstances, such as the occupation of some territories, the character of military operations, and the destruction of transport infrastructure. A strategy and research tools have been developed according to the actualized tasks. The individual approach to selecting locations for synchronous and asynchronous research, as well as respondents for online communication, is based primarily on solid expeditionary background. The main stages of research work, ways of observing territories, the optimal time and methods of documenting oral history and visual materials remotely have been identified relying at the same time on the examples of studying specific social phenomena at a distance presented in the national and foreign scientific literature.

The experience gained in studying the peculiarities of agricultural practices in a small town in times of hardship using the method of remote ethnography gives grounds to consider effective the combination of such techniques as conducting a series of semi-structured individual and paired interviews by telephone, virtual communication with respondents in real time, the exchange of photo and video messages, and continuous monitoring of media content and social networks.

 

Keywords

remote ethnography, spatial inaccessibility, military everyday life, Russian-Ukrainian war, Ukrainian-Russian borderland.

 

References

  1. POLEK, Tina, Tetiana SANINA and Yuliia SOBOL. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Daily Practices of Childhood. Kyiv, 2021, 79 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  2. SIRENKO, Serhii. Fisheries of Ukraine in the Mid- to Late 19thEarly 21st Century: Tools and Methods of Fishing, Traditions, Transformations: An author’s abstract of Ph.D. thesis in History: speciality 07.00.05 (Ethnology) / National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; M. Rylskyi Institute of Art Studies, Folkloristics and Ethnology. Kyiv, 2015, 22 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  3. BURRELL, Jenna. «Through a Screen Darkly»: On Remote, Collaborative Fieldwork in the Digital Age. In: Roger SANJEK and Susan W. TRATNER, eds. eFieldnotes. The Makings of Anthropology in the Digital World. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016, pp. 132–153 [online]. Available from: https://dokumen.pub/efieldnotes-the-makings-of-anthropology-in-the-digital-world-9780812247787.html [in English].
  4. MEAD, Margaret and Rhoda MÉTRAUX, eds. The Study of Culture at a Distance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 480 [in English].
  5. POSTILL, John. Remote Ethnography. Studying Culture from Afar. In: Larissa HJORTH, Heather HORST, Anne GALLOWAY, and Genevieve BELL, eds. The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. New York; London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, pp. 61–60 [online]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/44417850/Remote_ethnography_studying_culture_from_afar [in English].
  6. YAVO-AYALON, Sharon, Cheng GONG, Harrison YU, Ilan MANDEL, Wendy JU. Walkie-Talkie Maps – A Novel Method to Conduct and Visualize Remote Ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2022, vol. 21, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221115519 [in English].

The texts are available under the terms of the Creative Commons
international license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
© ІМФЕ